The 2025 NFL Draft class is beginning to take form, and which means we’re getting a clearer image of among the high prospects and the place teams with essentially the most depth.
The highest prospect on the board is Colorado’s Travis Hunter, a uncommon expertise with the potential to begin on the NFL degree as both a large receiver or cornerback. After Hunter, Michigan standouts Mason Graham and Will Johnson, Arizona’s Tetairoa McMillan and Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty are among the premier gamers on this draft class.
The operating again, tight finish and offensive deal with positions appear to be the deepest and strongest on the offensive aspect of the ball. On protection, the sting defender group is as deep as we’ve seen in a number of years, dominating the projected high 50. There are additionally extra impression defensive backs this 12 months than a 12 months in the past, with loads of choices on all three days of the draft, particularly on Days 2 and three.
Listed here are PFF’s high 250 draft prospects within the 2025 NFL Draft, together with some preliminary scouting notes courtesy of lead draft analyst Trevor Sikkema.
For the total rating of draft prospects, together with their three-year participant grades and place rankings, click on right here.
Click on right here for extra draft instruments:
NFL Draft Huge Board | Mock Draft Simulator | NCAA Premium Stats
1. WR/CB Travis Hunter, Colorado
Strengths:
• Spectacular high pace/restoration pace
• Peak/size is an enormous plus for him in press protection
• A number of the greatest ball expertise you may ever see in a defensive again
• Has a knack for baiting QBs and making them pay in zone protection
• Elite zone-coverage participant in each approach
Weaknesses:
• Foot pace could be a tad delayed because of longer legs
• Lack of weight does present up when tackling and hand-fighting
• Generally is a bit uncontrolled at occasions
• Might stand to enhance true anticipation in man protection
2. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona
Strengths:
• Peak stands out on tape earlier than the primary snap. He has a difference-making dimension.
• Easy, lengthy strides
• Spectacular acceleration for his dimension
• Not often see false steps in his launch
• Comfy maximizing an enormous catch radius
• Simply two drops on 136 targets
Weaknesses:
• Very slender construct
• Very low separation scores vs. single protection in 2023 (38 contested targets)
• Naturally harder for him to sink/flip his hips for comebacks/curls
• Lacks the mass to be a constant blocker
3. DI Mason Graham, Michigan
Strengths:
• Elite first step explosiveness
• Glorious bend and suppleness for an inside participant
• Quick and highly effective palms
• Devastating push-pull transfer
• Robust participant who can maintain the road
Weaknesses:
• Arms look like on the shorter aspect
4. HB Ashton Jeanty, Boise State
Strengths:
• Dense, compact body for good heart of gravity/steadiness
• Pure smooth palms within the receiving recreation
• Turns into a playmaker after the catch
• Doesn’t shrink back from contact
• Glorious one-cut imaginative and prescient behind zone-blocking ideas
Weaknesses:
• Total dimension makes cross blocking a tough process, however he’s keen to do it
• Imaginative and prescient in man/hole scenario just isn’t decisive sufficient
• Can typically shimmy an excessive amount of when setting a defender up in area
5. CB Will Johnson, Michigan
Strengths:
• Change of path capacity is that of a a lot smaller nook –
• but over 6 foot and over 200 kilos
• Versatile to play left or proper aspect. He can shadow-cover WR1s
• Excellent understanding of leverages
• Easy when passing off receivers and choosing up gamers in zone
• Can play confidently within the slot if his task is lined up there
• Fluid transitions from backpedal to shuffle to full stride
• He understands include in run suits
Weaknesses:
• Has some inconsistent/ineffective timing with punches in press
• Prime pace is sweet however does not look like within the high tier with restoration
• Sloppy with tackling makes an attempt in 2024
6. ED Abdul Carter, Penn State
Strengths:
• Uncommon athlete for the place
• Pure explosiveness and bend are each elite
• Willingness to play bodily regardless of lighter weight
• Cross rushes like a basketball guard; cross-over model (basketball background)
Weaknesses:
• Has a small false step (might cowl much more floor off the snap)
• Must get extra exact with palms to remain clear throughout rushes; improved in 2024 with quick arm-over transfer
7. S Malaki Starks, Georgia
Strengths:
• Decrease weight quantity, however a well-built security
• Lengthy wingspan for cross breakups
• Prime pace could be very spectacular (sprinter background)
• Fixed pre-snap communicator
• Easy, fluid hips to maximise vary in deep protection
• Sound tackler with coordination and power; low missed deal with fee
• Elite ball expertise
Weaknesses:
• Actions can look a tad uncontrolled at occasions
• Generally is a little too aggressive in his pursuit angles
8. T Will Campbell, LSU
Strengths:
• Has a extra slim base however usually sturdy and balanced
• Physique actions are fast, compact and exact; at all times in management
• Fingers are up and lively, at all times able to strike with energy
• Affected person blocker
• Satisfactory energy for the professionals
Weaknesses:
• Larger pre-snap stance results in a excessive pas degree when partaking
• Arm size may very well be shorter than his 6-foot-6 body suggests
• Has some lack of flexibility in his groin to stretch his kicks/shield his outdoors shoulder
9. WR Luther Burden III, Missouri
Strengths:
• Nice all-around athlete
• Pure playmaker with the ball in his palms, evidenced by excessive YAC scores
• Very elusive after the catch
• Good steadiness for YAC
• Satisfactory lengthy pace for NFL
• Quick footwork for efficient releases
Weaknesses:
• Can get pushed round some within the blocking recreation
• Does not at all times assault the ball within the air
10. ED Nic Scourton, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Carries 280 kilos very effectively for an edge who will be OLB or DE
• Expertise taking part in each the fitting and left aspect of the road
• Many cross rush strikes already really feel second nature
• Savviness to “get skinny” between blockers
• Nice eyes for the place the ball goes
• Pure intuition to swipe his palms and keep clear
• Comfy shallow zone dropping from OLB spot
Weaknesses:
• Loses edge include by crashing down too usually (may very well be what he is taught)
• Is not as violent in his run protection persistently as he may very well be
11. T Kelvin Banks Jr., Texas
Strengths:
• Versatile hips and vast base for a robust, vast stance
• Foot pace/explosiveness is top-tier
• Can transfer whereas in a squatted place (low pad degree)
• Nice second-level/area blocker
• Pure athleticism provides him excessive zone-blocking potential
• Actually spectacular steadiness for a participant 320-plus kilos
Weaknesses:
• Peak hints at shorter arm size, which exhibits on tape
• Not an imposing run blocker. He lacks displacement to maneuver when sq. with a defensive lineman
• Too prone to push-pull strikes
• Fingers may very well be extra exact and on the prepared
12. QB Jalen Milroe, Alabama
Strengths:
• Not simply escapability however a real dual-threat athlete
• Ok athlete to power missed tackles in area
• Twitchy athleticism evident in throwing movement pace
• Can present very nice contact/accuracy on deep passes
• Skilled RPO quarterback
Weaknesses:
• Accuracy/decision-making variance is massive proper now — loads of spotlight performs but in addition loads of regrettable ones
• Holds the ball low and unfastened in his stance
• Accuracy can dip when he takes pace off his throw for shorter distances
• Can wrestle seeing non-primary defenders
• Time to throw/sacks taken is way too excessive, even for “you’re taking the unhealthy with the nice.”
13. LB Jalon Walker, Georgia
Strengths:
• Pure cross rusher off the sting
• Satisfactory dimension to play ILB/OLB within the NFL
• Explosive first step in all instructions
• Highly effective higher physique to stack blockers at punch
• Lengthy arms for a 6-2 body
Weaknesses:
• Doesn’t have a whole lot of expertise/success in protection
• His recreation at present lacks lateral quickness wanted for off-ball LB work
• Lacks true mastery of cross rush strikes because of time break up on and off the ball
14. QB Cameron Ward, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• True sidearm launch that’s David Carr-esque
• Skilled and profitable middle-of-field passer
• “By no means say die” kind of playmaker with good escapability
• Satisfactory arm power for the NFL degree
• Spectacular and pure contact passer
Weaknesses:
• Holds the ball under the shoulders in his stance, which makes for an extended launch
• Facet arm launch is unique however feels too different throw-to-throw
• Accuracy numbers are excessive, however that’s extra because of quantity; true ball placement is not constant
• Ball safety (fumbling) wants to enhance
15. T Josh Simmons, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Stance and base is vast and robust pre
• and post-snap
• Improbable steadiness; can slide and mirror whereas in a squatted place
• Persistently low pad degree at contact
• Satisfactory size for OT within the NFL
• Footwork is fast; slide size is enough
• Aggressive participant who performs by the whistle
• Actually good footwork when anchoring
Weaknesses:
• Fingers have a low place to begin
• Does not have true displacement power within the run recreation
• Decrease weight makes anchoring harder (although good knee bend and steadiness assist)
16. WR Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Very fast, managed participant
• Excessive separation scores because of elite physique management/pace management
• Keen, feisty blocker
• Excessive IQ participant who is aware of the way to assault leverages and discover area
• Good steadiness by contact for yards after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Lack of dimension does restrict the efficacy of blocking talents
17. T Aireontae Ersery, Minnesota
Strengths:
• Satisfactory dimension, weight distribution and size for the NFL
• Gentle on his ft for a participant of his dimension
• Explosive first step and high pace for 330 kilos
• Cross professional is fairly superior with kick slide and handwork
• Good footwork when anchoring
• Affect zone-run blocker
Weaknesses:
• Excessive-waisted participant. It’s harder for him to get his butt down in his stance, so he’ll bend on the waist for contact
• Weight is just too far on his toes proper now
• Might have higher judgment towards stunts
18. T Wyatt Milum, West Virginia
Strengths:
• Pure athlete who can preserve his ft below him with steadiness when taking contact
• Satisfactory dimension and size to play deal with within the execs
• Actually sturdy grip power
• Sound, constant anchoring method
• Dependable run blocking in each man and zone
• Good, conscious participant
Weaknesses:
• First step is slower; struggles to catch up towards pace rushers
• Weight is a bit too on his toes; leaning into contact will get him in bother if he is not full sq. with the defender
• Seems to have some stiffness in his hips that stops him from getting his butt down in his stance for steadiness and leverage
19. CB Benjamin Morrison, Notre Dame
Strengths:
• Seems to have very lengthy arms, even for a CB at 6-foot
• Fingers are up and lively in press protection
• Fast to transition from shuffle to full strides
• Good consciousness and timing for getting his head round to search out the ball
• Keen run defender
• Very excessive IQ participant
Weaknesses:
• Energy is considerably of a priority with getting off blocks and tackling
• Begin/cease capacity is sweet, particularly for his dimension, however not top-tier
• Can get grab-y on WRs to stay with them on comeback routes
20. TE Colston Loveland, Michigan
Strengths:
• Very spectacular athlete, even for a lighter weight tight finish
• Pure cross catcher
• Crisp, explosive routes
• Has change-of-direction flexibility to run routes with a number of breaks
• Has the body/size to dam secondary gamers effectively; some linebackers
Weaknesses:
• Reveals fundamentals as a blocker however lacks the true dimension to deal with defensive ends
• Catch share may very well be greater
• May very well be extra artistic after the catch
21. QB Shedeur Sanders, Colorado
Strengths:
• Robust, vast base with good dimension within the decrease half to generate throwing energy from his legs
• Repeatable, basically sound throwing movement (excessive launch level helps make up for smaller top)
• Good zip on passes inside 25 yards
• Psychological and bodily toughness to step up and take successful whereas delivering a throw
• Good really feel/anticipation for attacking zone
• Slippery within the backfield regardless of lack of mobility
• Not afraid to look bottom of the formation on scrambles
Weaknesses:
• Ball pace can die on him within the air past 40 yards
• Launch pace is average-to-below-average
• Arm power is common for NFL requirements
• Does not at all times end throwing movement throughout the physique
• Under-average mobility (excessive sack fee)
22. T Cameron Williams, Texas
Strengths:
• Glorious dimension for an offensive deal with
• Superb arm size that appears longer than his 6-5 listed top
• First step explosiveness is noteworthy for his weight
• Robust grip as soon as he locks on
• Good eyes and really feel for the place hazard is coming from
• Has a finisher’s mentality
Weaknesses:
• Can explode effectively for his dimension, however you possibly can inform the ft are heavy
• Punch timing is not at all times constant, particularly when gamers come proper at him
• Should clear up penalties (may very well be an absence of begins)
23. WR Isaiah Bond, Texas
Strengths:
• Prime-tier athlete
• Is aware of he must hand-fight vertical releases, not simply run by them each time
• Not afraid to place his physique on the road for catches
• WIll make robust catches by contact regardless of his smaller dimension
• Nice stop-and-start physique management
Weaknesses:
• Releases and routes lack nuance
• Wants to know the way to cease when he finds area
24. ED Mykel Williams, Georgia
Strengths:
• Nice construct for an edge participant; weight and size are pro-caliber
• Has a violent and quick arm-over/swing transfer when attacking inside
• Good understanding of some great benefits of his arm size
• His first step is explosive and may cowl a ton of floor
• Nice motor that performs to the whistle
• Robust, dependable run defender
Weaknesses:
• Persistently one of many final linemen out of his stance
• Has a false step in his cross rush reps that may very well be cleaned up
• Fingers are lively however may very well be extra exact in cross rush
• Eyes for the ball might enhance
25. DI Kenneth Grant, Michigan
Strengths:
• Distinctive quickness for a participant of his dimension
• Fast to get to counters
• Energetic palms in passing lanes for batted passes
• Only a actually good athlete for a participant of his dimension
Weaknesses:
• Might prioritize power extra at his dimension
• Offers up leverage and performs excessive too usually
26. ED Shemar Stewart, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Imposing dimension, even for NFL requirements
• Prime-tier explosiveness at his dimension
• Pace to energy will be dominant
• Violent palms to disengage
• Spectacular capacity to nook for his dimension
Weaknesses:
• Has a constant false step that must be cleaned up
• He lets tackles get their palms on him first
• Cross rush plans want refinement and extra finesse
• Too reliant on the “see the ball, get the ball” mentality. He must anticipate
• Should play with higher steadiness
27. HB Omarion Hampton, North Carolina
Strengths:
• Constructed like an NFL again in measurables, weight distribution and athleticism
• Relishes within the bodily facets of the place
• Needs to erase individuals in cross professional
• Elite energy in his decrease half for leg drive by contract and explosiveness in area
Weaknesses:
• Inconsistent mix of persistence and hesitancy behind the LOS
• Overeager to get upfield, at occasions; might stand to be extra affected person for his blockers at second degree
28. WR Elic Ayomanor, Stanford
Strengths:
• Has the body and willingness to be an efficient blocker by the whistle
• Explosive athlete who can speed up shortly with a very good high pace
• Acutely aware of launch method to assault totally different leverages
• Showcases excessive soccer IQ and consciousness for only a one-year starter
Weaknesses:
• Fingers may very well be stronger, particularly in visitors
• Takes him additional time to cease or actually change path
29. HB Kaleb Johnson, Iowa
Strengths:
• Robust north-to-south runner between the tackles
• Realy good burst and high pace for his weight
• Has the steadiness to shrug off arm tackles for YAC
• Good imaginative and prescient, particularly behind ZBS
• Always reducing to search out open area
Weaknesses:
• Not a lot expertise in any respect as a receiver
• Upfield urgency can result in not letting blocks arrange
30. HB Quinshon Judkins, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Fast, explosive footwork within the backfield to leap gaps and speed up when he sees area
• Keen, basically sound cross protector
• Robust core, spectacular steadiness for yards after contact
• Lengthy pace seems above common for the NFL degree
• Performs with a very good degree of competitiveness/toughness
• One fumble in over 500 carries from 2022-2023
Weaknesses:
• Was not relied on a lot within the passing recreation
• Typically, his weight can get slightly too far over his toes, and he can lose steadiness
• He has excessive pass-blocking potential, however there are occasions he dips his head too far and drops his eyes
31. TE Tyler Warren, Penn State
Strengths:
• Has the body to play in-line, as a wingback and fullback
• Lengthy arms are advantageous for catch radius and when blocking
• Maintain up effectively versus energy towards most defensive ends
• Very sturdy participant
• Not afraid of the bodily facets of the sport
• Huge-time manufacturing enhance as a receiver in 2024
Weaknesses:
• A bit stiffer to alter path, which limits his route tree
32. DI Tyleik Williams, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Compact, highly effective stance pre-snap
• Has the body to play each nostril and 3-tech
• Explosive first step to shoot gaps, create energy and cross face
• Hand pace, precision and function a lot improved in 2024
Weaknesses:
• Tends to pop up shortly to lose leverage
• Loses floor a bit an excessive amount of when taking up combo blocks
• Doesn’t have sufficient cross rush strikes/counters
33. CB Trey Amos, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Satisfactory dimension to play on the subsequent degree
• A great athlete in all sides with a monitor and multi-sport background
• Very excessive compelled incompletion fee for every of the final three seasons
• Excellent protection instincts
• Likes to get his palms on receivers and be bodily to remain on them
• Very lively palms in press, on the breakpoint, and on the catch level
• Arm size seems to be above the fiftieth percentile
• Good power to tear off WR blocks
Weaknesses:
• Prime pace will not “wow” you regardless of sprinter background
• Lacks fundamentals and a fireplace for tackling (tackles excessive too usually)
34. ED James Pearce Jr., Tennessee
Strengths:
• Very twitchy participant with an explosive first step
• Fast off the ball with a very good snap response
• Very quick palms with excessive potential for effectiveness
• Respectable speed-to-power punch, given his low weight
• Spot drop protection is not his sturdy go well with, however he has the motion expertise for it
• Good anticipation for snap rely/acceptable pre-snap shifts
Weaknesses:
• Gentle weight makes it simpler to lock him up/end him to the bottom
• Not a lot flexibility to play him wherever inside 5-tech
• Lacks pass-rush nuance and method
35. CB Shavon Revel, East Carolina
Strengths:
• Very explosive athlete, particularly for his dimension
• Prime pace will probably be within the high percentile
• Keen and bodily run defender
• Footwork is quick sufficient to match WR actions, particularly in press protection
• Willy bully you in press protection
Weaknesses:
• Explosive, however uncontrolled at occasions
• Anticipation and spacing remains to be inconsistent
• Has the power and size to get off blocks however wants to hurry up getting clear
• Excessive compelled incompletion fee however missing takeaway coordination
36. DI T.J. Sanders, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Fast palms to have interaction and get off blocks
• Plus arm size for an inside participant
• Aggressive third-down participant
• Explosive first step laterally and linearly
• Has some twitch for a man who’s 295
• Lengthy arms for PBUs
Weaknesses:
• Offers up leverage shortly post-snap
• Can get overzealous to shoot a spot in run protection
• Doesn’t maintain up effectively towards doubles
• Might end tackles/sacks higher
37. ED LT Overton, Alabama
Strengths:
• Nicely-build defensive lineman; excessive weight, however not slowly and distributed appropriately for all-around power
• Highly effective edge rusher who can pack at puch at contact/tackling
• Highly effective palms for an efficient membership transfer
• Shocking flexibility to show the nook at his dimension
• Construct-up pace is terrifying
• Robust stack and shed capacity
• Can keep pad degree when shuffling the road
Weaknesses:
• Higher run defender than cross rusher
• Struggles to get off blocks cleanly persistently
• Must develop counters for when linemen actually get palms on him
• Hand placement may very well be extra constant to maximise leverage in run protection/anchoring
38. CB Jahdae Barron, Texas
Strengths:
• Satisfactory dimension and power for run protection/tackling from slot
• Good closing pace
• Energy and power to work by blocks for tackles
• Expertise and luxury on the linebacker degree
• Good really feel for spot zone protection
• Good eyes and anticipation irrespective of the place he’s lined up
• Versatility for any DB spot
Weaknesses:
• Hips slightly slower to flip to match route breaks
• Can get uncomfortable when his again is to the ball (cross interference); higher in 2024
• Prime pace is best than acceleration
39. DI Walter Nolen, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Nicely constructed participant
• Extremely sturdy, particularly with momentum; uncooked power and explosiveness are evident persistently
• Has the construct to play each defensive finish and defensive deal with
• Good effort to the whistle
Weaknesses:
• Seemed much less uncontrolled in 2024, however nonetheless must be extra purposeful in what he does
• Lacks a go-to cross rush transfer
40. ED Landon Jackson, Arkansas
Strengths:
• Distinction-making construct; top, weight and size above ninetieth percentile for edge
• Satisfactory power to carry the road and tackle pulling blockers
• Shocking flexibility (at occasions) for his dimension
• Lengthy arms make for an in depth tackling radius
Weaknesses:
• Harm historical past that features two ACL accidents (one from highschool, one from early faculty)
• Bigger body limits twitch/C.O.D.
• Step one is respectable, however pace is extra build-up
41. ED Princely Umanmielen, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Twitchy participant with good C.O.D. motion
• Naturally and successfully will get throughout the face of OL
• Longer arms than his top signifies
• Has the motion expertise to identify drop in protection
• Has pace to catch RBs from the bottom
Weaknesses:
• Footwork may very well be cleaned up; ft are angled, pushes off again foot on the snap, not at all times set on the snap
• Feels erratic at occasions; actions might use extra precision
• Must be extra constant snap-to-snap
42. DI Omarr Norman-Lott, Tennessee
Strengths:
• Explosive and highly effective 3-tech defensive deal with
• Pure 4-point stance rusher with nice leverage off snap
• Spectacular higher physique power to bench press lineman again
• Can maintain up effectively towards double groups
• Shocking flexibility and bend for an inside participant
Weaknesses:
• Must make a rip transfer extra of second nature when taking pictures gaps
• Must go in with extra of a pass-rush plan
• Freelances an excessive amount of as a run defender
• Performs on the bottom slightly greater than you need
43. LB Jihaad Campbell, Alabama
Strengths:
• Superb dimension and size for an off-ball backer on the NFL degree
• Lengthy strides make pursuit a breeze
• Viable pace rush choice as a pass-rushing OLB
• Lengthy arms for batted passes and cross breakups
Weaknesses:
• Anticipation remains to be a tick sluggish for the place the ball is/goes
• Nonetheless creating that “really feel” in protection; he has to see it to make a play on it proper now
• Might play with a bit extra urgency/at a better pace
• Tends to goal excessive when tackling
44. T Gray Zabel, North Dakota State
Strengths:
• Prime-tier grip power
• Excellent at lining his tackets up between the shoulders, whether or not on the line or on the hoof
• Nice athlete for an offensive lineman
• Explosive first step to thrive in a zone-blocking scheme
• Leg drive is fixed and efficient
• Nice core power to take care of blocks but not yield holding penalties
• Flexibility to sink his hips in his stance regardless of 6-6 body
Weaknesses:
• Weight profile is low for an OT, even decrease for an IOL; must placed on weight
• Most of his misplaced reps come from edge rushers beating him inside
45. ED Ashton Gillotte, Louisville
Strengths:
• Good weight within the decrease half for a powerful leg drive
• Very sturdy participant general
• Good first step explosiveness; no false steps
• Has a bodily mentality wanted for trench play
• Impactful stunt participant as crasher or looper
• Fingers are violent when he throws any type of chop or swipe
Weaknesses:
• Likes to push his blockers however must get off blocks faster
• Fingers are quick however not exact
• Arm size may very well be under the edge for some groups
• Considerably restricted flexibility for bend and C.O.D.
46. ED Jack Sawyer, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Good eyes, timing and power to stack and shed in run protection
• First step is persistently from the entrance foot in his stance (2-pt or 3-pt)
• Essentially sound participant who is never out of place or with wasted actions
• Robust higher physique to execute push and stack maneuvers in cross rush and run protection
Weaknesses:
• Wants a deeper cross rush bag
• Does not seem to have imposing power
• Not a flexible cross rusher on the skin
• A great athlete however appears to lack eye-popping explosiveness to threaten outdoors shoulders
47. CB Darien Porter, Iowa State
Strengths:
• Very alluring size for the place
• Actually clean and pure mover, given his top and size
• His receiver background makes him a pure on the catch level
• Lighter body makes him simpler to dam, however he understands taking up blocks and funneling ball carriers again inside
• Hip flips and acceleration are top-tier for a 6-foot-2-plus defensive again
Weaknesses:
• Dealt with fairly simply towards pulling OL and even TEs in run protection
• Lack of reps as a CB does present up in anticipation, particularly when approaching to deal with
• Punch in press could be a bit mistimed (inexperience factor)
48. HB TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Will get as much as full pace in a short time
• Quick footwork to power missed tackles and select operating lanes behind man- and gap-blocking ideas
• Very agile again
• Can steadiness momentum effectively at excessive speeds
Weaknesses:
• Not a whole lot of physique density to energy by full tackles
• Is not as decisive behind zone blocking as he’s behind man/hole blocking
• Tends to wish to bounce to the sideline slightly an excessive amount of
• Has the agility for rote operating however not an excessively pure pass-catcher
49. ED JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Highly effective first step with few, if any, false steps
• Can get low and highly effective in pre-snap stance (4-pt and 3-pt)
• Robust leg drive that strikes OL past first contact
• Constant hand placement with good leverage
• Swipes are quick and exact to maintain him clear when crossing the face
• Fearless to crash down towards pulling linemen
Weaknesses:
• Capability to nook is restricted because of lack of pace and bend
• Anticipation could be a tick sluggish at occasions
• Can wrestle towards OTs with lengthy arms
50. ED Kyle Kennard, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Explosive first step; good speed-to-power rusher
• Quick first step turns into good pursuit high pace
• Very quick palms make him robust to remain in entrance of
• Seems to have plus arm size for the place
• Good bag of preliminary cross rush strikes
Weaknesses:
• Naturally rushes excessive from a 2-point stance
• Must develop extra counters when the primary transfer fails
51. HB Dylan Sampson, Tennessee
52. S Kamari Ramsey, USC
Strengths:
• Excessive IQ; exhibits a stable really feel for the sport
• Quick to anticipate and set off downhill
• Can play within the slot because of dependable run protection
• Dependable tackler with potential for giant hits
Weaknesses:
• Can take poor run-defense angles
• Appears to dive at ankles greater than you’d assume
53. ED Donovan Ezeiruaku, Boston Faculty
Strengths:
• Step one is each explosive and clean
• Fast, second nature to make use of the rip transfer as a finisher to different strikes
• Is aware of his arm size will be a bonus and makes use of it persistently
• Maximizes leverage to make up for lack of weight
• Constant, dependable effort
• Good eyes and anticipation for the ball
Weaknesses:
• Powerful for him to tackle pullers and lead blockers
• Pursuit pace and explosiveness seem average-to-below-average
54. TE Mason Taylor, LSU
Strengths:
• Nicely-built, athletic body
• Has the scale and expertise to play in-line in addition to within the slot
• Gentle as a blocker however does have good hand placement and method
Weaknesses:
• Lack of weight exhibits up when combating within the trenches
• Slender construct for an in-line participant; would possibly must placed on about 10 lbs.
55. TE Gunnar Helm, Texas
Strengths:
• Good core and grip power to wall off defensive linemen as a blocker
• Balanced receiver after the catch
Weaknesses:
-Struggles towards many highly effective edge rushers
• Might use extra “pop” as a blocker
56. ED Mike Inexperienced, Marshall
Strengths:
• Satisfactory size for the place on the NFL degree (lengthy arms)
• Nicely construct, balanced. You do not see him on the bottom or knocked off his ft
• Explosive first step to instantly threaten tackles’ steadiness and quickness
• Good lateral quickness to shoot gaps inside
• Persistently bodily
Weaknesses:
• Launching off his entrance foot might assist when attacking outdoors
• Worst recreation got here towards the most effective competitors in OSU
57. S Kevin Winston Jr., Penn State
Strengths:
• Good top/size for man protection and to disrupt the catch level
• Nice downhill pace
• Bodily participant who can flip his pace into energy
• Has some flexibility and bend to him when blitzing
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct, however that does not appear to restrict his tackling efficacy
• Can get fooled by play motion and misdirection performs because of a extra aggressive strategy
• Missing anticipation in protection; an excessive amount of reacting after the transfer is made
58. ED Jared Ivey, Mississippi
59. WR Xavier Restrepo, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• Good all-around athlete with a very good mix of power, quickness and physique management
• Seems sturdy for his dimension
• Good steadiness to take and dish out contact
• Exact route runner with sharp actions to create separation
• Robust, dependable palms
Weaknesses:
• Lacks distinction making high pace
• Restricted YAC participant, even from the slot
• Hand placement is hit-and-miss when blocking
• Restricted expertise versus press
60. LB Chris Paul Jr., Mississippi
Strengths:
• Pure mover downhill, retreating or side-to-side
• Good pursuit pace versus outdoors zone and toss performs
• Sq., dependable wrap-up tackler
• Fast to acknowledge and set off to the ball
• Can play WILL in 4-3 or MIKE in 3-4
Weaknesses:
• Tape has you wishing he had extra weight on him
• Can get single-blocked by tight ends
61. WR Kyren Lacy, LSU
Strengths:
• Lengthy arms for a large catch radius
• Persistently extends his palms to get the ball within the air
• Lengthy, clean strides at high pace
• Reveals good footwork on the sidelines
Weaknesses:
• Can have a false step in his launch
• Slower to speed up out of his launch
• Lengthy pace will not put concern within the hearts of NFL DBs
• Should eradicate drops shifting ahead
62. S Sebastian Castro, Iowa
Strengths:
• Has the power to line up 1-on-1 vs. TEs
• Dependable and relentless run defender
• Decently fast footwork/hips for change of path and acceleration
• Highly effective tackler who can impression even the largest ball carriers
• Excessive soccer IQ; not often out of place
Weaknesses:
• Shorter arms do make it harder to get off blocks
• Footwork is fast, however high pace is restricted
• Struggles to reflect among the higher athletes within the slot
63. WR Tre Harris, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Not a really numerous route runner, however if you happen to ask him to get vertical, he can try this
• Good contact steadiness and power for yards after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Gradual ft out of his launch
• Gradual acceleration for build-up pace
• Doesn’t get off press in addition to a participant of his dimension would recommend
• Creates separation through power and push-offs greater than subtlety and savviness
64. DI Alfred Collins, Texas
Strengths:
• Nice size for an inside participant
• Robust higher physique with a imply long-arm transfer
• Violent, sturdy palms
• Good power to battle by double groups
• Devastating push-pull power
Weaknesses:
• Gradual pursuit pace for something outdoors the tackles
• Pad degree is of course excessive
• Can let OL get their palms inside on him first
65. G Tyler Booker, Alabama
Strengths:
• Nicely-built guard with NFL dimension
• Weight distribution provides him a ton of energy in his decrease half to displace and anchor
• Nice leg drive to maneuver linemen towards their will
• Robust palms and core to not disengage after strikes and counters
• Imposing double crew blocker
• Toes are faster than common, particularly for his dimension
• Spectacular get better capacity; vast base even post-snap
• Good eyes for stunts and delayed blitzes
• Finisher’s mentality
Weaknesses:
• Stability will be off at occasions. Typically, it is an excessive amount of on his heels, and different occasions, an excessive amount of on his toes
• Quicker DL can assault one shoulder too simply
66. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU
Strengths:
• Satisfactory NFL arm power
• Has a watch for the deep cross; fearless to take huge photographs
• Pure passer who can ship passes with zip and accuracy even with no throwing platform
Weaknesses:
• Lack of expertise exhibits up in being late to reads
• Too comfy retreating to keep away from strain
• Too unfastened along with his decrease physique mechanics
67. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati
Strengths:
• Spectacular hand pace and placement to win reps persistently
• Good pure leverage, low pads
• Highly effective decrease physique
• Fast first step to shoot gaps
• Good eyes in run protection to know when to shed
Weaknesses:
• Peak hints at his arm size being under common
• Wants extra pass-rush strikes/counters past energy rush
• Lack of arm size hurts the pace through which he can shed blockers
68. T Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona
Strengths:
• Vast, low base for a pre-snap stance
• Footwork pace could be very fast
• Good core power and steadiness
• Good hand quickness for preliminary punch and restoration/hand combating
• Robust leg drive for displacement within the run recreation
Weaknesses:
• Arm size seems effectively under common for OTs
• Might use extra energy at punch
• Lack of arm size makes it simpler to get throughout his face clear
• Should anticipate higher to reflect cross rushers/stunts
• Stride size on kick slides is restricted
69. CB Zy Alexander, LSU
Strengths:
• Skilled man protection defender who’s assured in press method
• 14 profession interceptions and a compelled incompletion share above 10% in 4 straight seasons
• Expertise hand combating and persistently disrupting receivers all through the route
• Does a very good job of anticipating actions from press
• Is aware of the way to learn the eyes of the receiver and anticipate the ball along with his again turned
• Keen tackler with a really low missed deal with fee
Weaknesses:
• Not essentially the most explosive or twitchy athlete within the class, however he is not a legal responsibility by any means
• Prime pace vs. vertical receivers is above common however not within the nice class
• Footwork may very well be cleaned up; he does not must get his heels so shut collectively
70. WR Kobe Hudson, UCF
Strengths:
• Runs routes like a degree guard crossing somebody up
• Will tempo his routes and releases to arrange defenders
• When he remembers to get his palms concerned, he is an efficient hand fighter
Weaknesses:
• Too inconsistent with hand combating
• Prime pace seems common at greatest for the NFL degree (lacks a separation gear)
71. WR Jalen Royals, Utah State
Strengths:
• Robust palms on the catch level
• Persistently extends his palms to assault the ball within the air
• Nuanced route runner who exhibits consciousness of various speeds
• Robust vs. press with a very good launch bundle
• Lengthy pace is common for the NFL degree
• Will bounce off low/ankle tackles for YAC
Weaknesses:
• Acceleration will be cold and hot
• Nice at contested catches however has a whole lot of observe with an absence of separation
72. T Charles Grant, William & Mary
Strengths:
• Explosive out of his stance
• Balanced and coordinated on the hoof
• Versatile decrease half for lengthy stretches/strides in cross units
• Good core power (wrestling) to stay in blocks regardless of twists from DL
• May give you a pleasant pop at first punch
Weaknesses:
• Lacks some sand within the pants for anchoring and leg drive
• Can wrestle when linemen deliver extra energy towards him
73. DI Deone Walker, Kentucky
Strengths:
• Very fast first step for a participant of his dimension
• Has a baseline for a wide range of pass-rush strikes
• Has the size to play 4-3 DE
• Hand utilization is fast regardless of his very lengthy size
• Good pure energy in his higher physique
Weaknesses:
• Not a whole lot of weight in his decrease half regardless of 350 lbs; ankles/calves are skinny
• Excessive-waisted construct makes it harder for him to take a seat in his stance with leverage/energy
• Pops up shortly out of his stance
74. CB Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky
Strengths:
• Strong wrap-up tackler
• Reveals a very good understanding of run-fit duties
• Peak and size are above common for the place
• Satisfactory pace and acceleration
Weaknesses:
• Fingers get fairly grab-y when he will get in bother
• Lacks true anticipation; can look uncontrolled at occasions with turns and steps
• Excessive INTs had been extra opportunistic than true ball expertise and anticipation
75. S Lathan Ransom, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Good dimension and size to cowl a wide range of defenders
• Flipping hips, footwork is clean in protection
• Excellent vary in protection and pursuit
• Does not shrink back from taking up blocks; took his physicality to a different degree in 2024
Weaknesses:
• Construct is slender to tackle larger ball carriers, although he does have good weight
• Has the eyes to play within the field however can get pushed round
76. LB Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon
Strengths:
• Good athlete who’s assigned slot-coverage duties versus tight ends
• Lengthy arms are perfect when tacking on blockers and sustaining distance
• Quick to the sideline however maintains sq. shoulders when tackling
• Lengthy arms make for an extended tackling radius and simpler wrap-ups
• Performs with an perspective (in a great way)
• Fairly superior really feel/capacity in protection with a security background
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct would get picked on by pulling linemen
77. QB Drew Allar, Penn State
Strengths:
• NFL starter body in top and weight
• Simple arm power; ball comes out with NFL-level tempo
• Essentially sound follow-through for tight spiral and quick ball pace
• Fluid footwork for 3-, 5-, 7-step drops
• Makes safety calls on the line of scrimmage
• Accuracy improved from 2023-2024
Weaknesses:
• Mobility is enough for an enormous QB however under common general
• Accuracy is best in 2024, however true ball placement remains to be inconsistent
• Contact is enhancing, however he nonetheless wants progress with how sturdy of an arm he has
• Accuracy points/TWPs come from being late on his reads
78. TE Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt
Strengths:
• Huge catch radius with an above-average wingspan
• Explosive participant with good acceleration and high pace
• Glorious trick play passer with QB background
Weaknesses:
• Acutely aware of getting lively palms however can nonetheless be engaged on punch timing as a blocker
• Nonetheless appears slightly uncoordinated in his routes (new to TE)
79. S Xavier Watts, Notre Dame
Strengths:
• Twitchy actions
• Good man protection motion expertise
• Tackling fundamentals aren’t as unhealthy as missed deal with fee in 2023 would point out
• nice really feel for the place the ball goes to make huge impacts within the passing recreation
Weaknesses:
• Very excessive missed deal with fee in 2023 (not as excessive as earlier seasons)
• Actions can really feel too frenetic with wasted steps
80. TE Harold Fannin Jr., Bowling Inexperienced
Strengths:
• Good playmaker mentality when the ball is in his palms
• Respectable burst for his dimension
• Balanced for yards after contact
• Robust palms on the catch level
• Transfer tight finish who can play within the slot or outdoors as an “X”
• Undersized however aggressive as a blocker in run blocking
Weaknesses:
• Actions can look a bit lumbering
• Gradual to cease and begin when altering path
• Lateral stiffness limits pass-blocking capacity
81. S Nick Emmanwori, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Imposing dimension for a MOF defender or slot participant
• Explosive participant for his dimension with good high pace due to lengthy strides
• Low missed deal with share as a starter
• Lengthy arms for an enormous deal with radius
• Put himself in a significantly better place to make huge performs in 2024
Weaknesses:
• A waisted construct makes it harder to alter path
• Must proceed to develop a really feel for the way to play his area — pursuit angles will be misjudged
82. DI Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Strengths:
• Has good arm size for an inside participant
• Quick palms off the snaps to get inside and dictate first strikes
• Push-pull and arm-over strikes are very pure and clean
Weaknesses:
• Construct is of course slightly high-waisted
• At his present weight, he’s lighter within the decrease half
• Membership transfer might use some extra violence to it
83. T Marcus Mbow, Purdue
84. G Donovan Jackson, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Very fast off the road and out of his stance
• Anchor method was improved from 2022 to 2023
• Eyes are at all times scanning for essentially the most harmful risk
• Footwork is quick; can get to the second degree, mirror and wall off in zone
Weaknesses:
• Fingers can flail a bit an excessive amount of and be out of place
• Does not have true displacement power for combo blocks
85. ED Tyler Baron, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• NFL caliber body in each top and weight
• Barely undersized for an NFL edge, however might put extra weight in his decrease half
• Good pure athlete with steadiness, power and pace
• Constant leg drive for bull rushes and getting off blocks
Weaknesses:
• Too many snaps the place he has a false begin or does not hearth off his entrance foot
• Cross rush strikes lack precision and function proper now
• Must develop extra counters to get off blocks faster
86. G Tate Ratledge, Georgia
Strengths:
• Spectacular footwork in cross professional to remain balanced and robust whereas shuffling
• Fingers ultimately get inside persistently
• Good grip power to take care of blocks
• Satisfactory leg drive for the pro-level
• Good method when combo blocking
• Good first-step quickness and coordination for climbing and zone-blocking
Weaknesses:
• The aiming level for his palms will be vast on the first punch
• Typically, he simply tries to overpower along with his higher physique (he is been higher in 2024)
87. ED Quandarrius Robinson, Alabama
Strengths:
• Superb top and size for edge place on the professional degree
• Size provides him a bonus with stack-and-shed (particularly towards TEs)
• Most comfy dashing from a two-point stance
Weaknesses:
• Lack of weight/leverage exhibits up in unfavorable run protection performs
• May be sluggish off the ball/snap
• Lacks top-level flexibility/bend
• Nonetheless uncooked in general anticipation and cross rush strikes/timing
88. S Jonas Sanker, Virginia
Strengths:
• Embraces the bodily necessities to play the sport on the professional degree
• Good athlete for the place within the NFL
• Versatile security who can play 2-high and within the slot
• Decently low missed deal with fee during the last two seasons
• Fast to acknowledge the place the ball goes out of the backfield to come back downhill
• Elementary tackler who packs a punch when his shoulder hits you with pace
Weaknesses:
• Can have over-aggressive and inconsistent pursuit angles to the ball when coming from depth
• Has reps the place he is overzealous to run downhill and may neglect his protection assignments
89. WR Tory Horton, Colorado State
Strengths:
• Actually good route runner for his dimension
• Very sturdy palms, even by contact
• Fingers are up and able to battle to get off press/contact
• Lengthy strides result in a pleasant top-speed
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct means he can get moved off his routes simpler
• Prime pace takes some time to get to
90. HB Bhayshul Tuten, Virginia Tech
No knowledge out there
91. CB Mello Dotson, Kansas
Strengths:
• Has some good twitch and C.O.D. motion capacity
• Good restoration pace
• Oily hips
• Retains his shoulder sq. when lining up tackles; not reckless in strategy
• Easy footwork in shuffle
• Good stop-and-start management and explosiveness
Weaknesses:
• Can get pushed off the road in press towards larger receivers
• Foot pace may very well be sooner, extra exact and able to explode
92. T Blake Miller, Clemson
Strengths:
• Actually spectacular motion expertise; explosive, fast, balanced
• Fingers are up and lively, but in addition affected person
• Exact along with his actions, always sq. to his defender
• Excessive IQ participant who’s aware of method and angles
• Spectacular core power to take care of blocks
Weaknesses:
• Decrease weight does make him simpler to maneuver
• A lighter body makes him prone to push-pull strikes, even from lighter edge gamers
93. CB Azareye’h Thomas, Florida State
Strengths:
• Fixed pre-snap communicator, whilst a nook
• Punch in press can actually jolt receivers again; palms are quick and violent
• Good blitzer; does not give it away, fast first step, lengthy arms up in passing lane
• Competitiveness is obvious in each recreation
• Good baseline of instincts in man and zone that may get even higher
• Satisfactory athlete for the NFL degree
• Seems to course of the sport at a excessive degree
Weaknesses:
• Can get taken for a trip versus pulling blockers and tight ends
• Does not have uncommon stop-and-start capacity for an extended nook
• Slender construct might use extra weight; exhibits up when tackling
• Athleticism is not a deal-breaker, however it does appear to be common
94. WR Antwane Wells Jr., Mississippi
Strengths:
• Good mixture of dimension and pace
• Robust on the catchy level, particularly down the sector
• Robust core and steadiness for yards after the catch/contact
• Explosive first step for releases and acceleration after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Routes are extra rounded than crisp
• Most of his route tree is vertical
• Inconsistent blocker
• Too comfy settling for contested catch conditions
95. ED Josaiah Stewart, Michigan
Strengths:
• Not afraid to be bodily regardless of a smaller stature
• All-around explosive athlete
• Can assault each shoulders when aligned vast
• Robust run defender through leverage and energy
Weaknesses:
• Seems like his body is maxed out at lighter weight
• Lack of stride size impression pursuit
• May be dealt with, strength-wise, one-on-one vs. TEs
• Nonetheless engaged on precision of palms with rush strikes
• Wants extra nuance/timing along with his inside cross
96. HB DJ Giddens, Kansas State
Strengths:
• Bodily gifted participant that may cross the “off the bus check” in top and weight
• Has the body to carry up in cross professional
• Has fairly pure palms as a receiver
• Good steadiness for his dimension to bounce off tackles
Weaknesses:
• Slower to anticipate precisely what transfer to make as a runner and cross blocker
• Not a “getaway” athlete for the professional degree
97. C Parker Brailsford, Alabama
Strengths:
• Quickness and explosiveness are big benefits
• Foot quickness to angle/wall off is pretty much as good because it will get
• Hand quickness/hand combating is spectacular in pace and precision
• Performs with way more energy than anticipated for his weight
• Glorious use of leverage and what size he has to power DL momentum upward
• Very spectacular grip power
Weaknesses:
• Sustaining blocks towards IDL on the NFL degree will probably be a bother
98. HB Ollie Gordon, Oklahoma State
Strengths:
• Superb NFL dimension
• Spectacular high pace for an enormous again; enough for the professionals
• Toes are nimble behind the LOS, particularly for his dimension
• Has the steadiness and power to brush off arm tackles and decrease the shoulder
Weaknesses:
• Good dimension and willingness for cross blocking, however not basically sound (will chop block, lunge with shoulder, head dips, and so on)
• Extra of a build-up pace runner than an explosive one
• A bit stiff when requested to stop-start or change path
• Imaginative and prescient/anticipation for area/blocks will be spotty
99. HB Kyle Monangai, Rutgers
Strengths:
• Mentality is to by no means go down on first contact
• Explosive in brief areas; good motion expertise for man/hole schemes
• Dense muscle mass that packs a punch when he lowers the shoulder
• Will erase individuals in cross professional
Weaknesses:
• Lengthy pace is common for the NFL degree
• Shorter arms make cross professional extra of a problem, however he has the power and mentality for it
• Virtually no expertise as a cross catcher
100. G Ar’maj Reed-Adams, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Has the burden/size to be a swing OL
• Good core power for steadiness and walling off defenders
• Grip power is robust, dependable
• Finisher’s mentality: doesn’t let up till the whistle is blown
• Footwork is fast, the bottom is vast and robust
• Fast to get his eyes in the fitting spot
Weaknesses:
• Construct is a bit high-waisted, harder to get his butt down
• Lacks some pop at contact however has good leg drive after
