• Unlock your edge with a PFF+ subscription: Get full entry to all our in-season fantasy instruments, together with weekly rankings, WR/CB matchup charts, weekly projections, the Begin-Sit Optimizer and extra. Enroll now!
Estimated studying time: 6 minutes
Welcome to the most recent installment of “Coach, I Was Open,” my ongoing statistics collection, the place I construct and refine a mannequin to foretell targets for each route in each NFL sport.
I created this mannequin utilizing route-level PFF knowledge to foretell the chance of every route being focused on each play within the NFL. This mannequin generates attention-grabbing metrics reminiscent of “share of predicted targets” and “share of predicted air yards.” These metrics are extra secure and predictive than their precise counterparts.
The core concept behind creating this mannequin is {that a} participant is perhaps “incomes targets” by constantly getting open and working precious routes however not receiving targets for varied causes—reminiscent of quarterback strain, a misinterpret, or the quarterback forcing the ball elsewhere. After reviewing the movie, groups might acknowledge that sure gamers have been open and alter their sport plan to contain them extra in subsequent weeks.
Later on this article, we’ll analyze quarterbacks’ decision-making in Week 13, highlighting each optimum and suboptimal selections.
Week 13 Recap
D.J. Moore was undoubtedly the headliner final week, ending with a — consider it or not — career-high 16 targets. That is precisely what the mannequin is making an attempt to establish.
Marvin Harrison Jr. additionally noticed a career-high in targets (12) however didn’t actually produce any significant fantasy stat traces.
Xavier Legette (8) and Tucker Kraft (7) completed with their second-most targets ever.
Total, I’d contemplate these examples an enormous success for the mannequin’s efficacy.
IDENTIFYING BREAKOUT CANDIDATES FOR WEEK 13
Final time Ja’Marr Chase was our headliner, he produced 55.40 fantasy factors and noticed a whopping 17 targets. It was simply our greatest mannequin play of the whole season. In Week 14, the Bengals land a strong matchup towards a Cowboys protection that permits a number of single-coverage conditions. The Bengals are a heavy go group that doesn’t must be pushed to go the ball, so I anticipate a strong exhibiting from Chase this week.
This is perhaps Calvin Ridley’s first look on this listing. Because the Titans’ WR1, Ridley noticed simply seven targets in Week 13 however now faces a positive matchup and a revenge sport towards the Jaguars. Over the previous month, Jacksonville has allowed the best price of single-coverage alternatives within the league. Ridley’s goal share jumps considerably in these conditions, rising from 23.5% to 39.3%.
Attention-grabbing be aware: Wan’Dale Robinson had the sixth-greatest distinction between “predicted targets” (6.3) and “precise targets” (2) on the season.
Verify-in on the season leaders for Share of Predicted Targets:
A number of gamers, together with Zay Flowers, Garrett Wilson and Keenan Allen, are getting into strong regression territory. These receivers have posted sturdy numbers for “share of predicted targets” however have but to completely capitalize on these alternatives. Primarily, they’re working precious routes and constantly getting open, however varied components restrict their manufacturing. In the event that they proceed this development of making alternatives, a constructive spike in efficiency is probably going on the horizon.
Malik Nabers has been the chief for the whole season. He’s elite however performs in an offense that’s nowhere near elite. He’ll proceed to wrestle so long as Tommy DeVito or Drew Lock is throwing him the ball.
Courtland Sutton is our new chief in “share of predicted air yards,” that means Denver is sending him downfield extra usually. This can be a nice signal for Sutton and Bo Nix, because it means they belief each gamers with extra deep (fantasy-relevant) alternatives.
Quarterback Optimum Choices Week 13
The Predicted Targets Mannequin permits us to guage a quarterback’s efficiency over a single sport, a collection of video games and even a complete season. This mannequin analyzes each route on each play, calculating the chance {that a} given participant might be focused primarily based on components reminiscent of openness, PFF grade, stage of separation and extra. By leveraging this route-level knowledge, we will decide whether or not the quarterback made an optimum resolution. I filtered all the knowledge solely to performs the place there have been not less than two routes on a play in order that the QB needed to decide.
To simplify the evaluation, I categorized each resolution into three distinct classes:
- Optimum Determination: The quarterback threw to the participant with the best goal chance.
- Suboptimal Determination: The quarterback threw to a participant who didn’t have the best goal chance.
- Unhealthy Determination: The quarterback threw to the participant with the bottom goal chance.
Justin Herbert had one other tough outing in Week 13 concerning optimum decision-making, ending final within the NFL for the second consecutive week. Whereas a decrease optimum resolution price isn’t at all times a foul signal—typically indicating a quarterback’s willingness to make high-level throws, like “throwing a participant open”—Herbert’s 31.2% BAD resolution price is regarding. Which means that over 30% of his passes focused the receiver with the smallest goal chance, which raises questions.
Herbert might want to clear this up for the Chargers to make a severe Tremendous Bowl run. It’s value noting, nonetheless, that this metric isn’t essentially a measure of quarterback efficiency within the conventional sense—PFF grades are higher fitted to that. As an alternative, it supplies perception into “how good it may have been” or “how dangerous it may have been,” making it a useful gizmo for evaluating resolution high quality.
Jameis’ day trip
Jameis Winston delivered probably the most fascinating performances of the season, setting a career-high in passing yards whereas throwing six complete touchdowns—although two, sadly, went to the fallacious group. For essentially the most half, Winston demonstrated strong decision-making, however both the execution faltered on Cleveland’s finish or the Broncos’ protection stepped up with distinctive performs to capitalize on errors.
Taking a look at Winston’s second pick-six:
This snapshot may not scream “pick-six,” however that’s precisely what occurred. Winston releases the ball with strong anticipation, however the throw is barely off-target, touchdown on Elijah Moore’s left shoulder—the facet closest to the defender, Ja’Quan McMillian. That positioning creates the proper alternative for McMillian to make an excellent play, outjumping and outmuscling Moore to snag the interception. McMillian then takes all of it the way in which again for a landing.
In most eventualities, this setup would possible end in a acquire of 5 or extra yards, however not this time. It’s value noting that the mannequin rated this as a superb resolution, with Moore having a 54% goal chance. Nevertheless, this sequence underscores an necessary level: even essentially the most optimum choices can unravel if the execution falters.
Justin Herbert made some attention-grabbing choices final week
An alarming 31.2% of Herbert’s go makes an attempt (on performs with two or extra routes) in Week 13 have been categorized as “dangerous.” This implies Herbert focused the participant with the bottom goal chance on the play practically a 3rd of the time.
This play begins with a simple dropback for the Chargers, devoid of play motion. Each Ladd McConkey and Stone Smartt are open early within the play, giving Justin Herbert two viable choices relying on his danger tolerance and confidence. Nevertheless, as an alternative of capitalizing on both goal, Herbert hesitates, holds onto the ball, and scrambles to his left, regardless that the pocket is comparatively clear and there’s no rapid strain.
The body beneath captures the second Herbert lastly releases the ball after extending the play unnecessarily by rolling out for a number of seconds.
By hesitating and rolling out, Herbert allowed the defenders ample time to regulate, culminating in a poor resolution. Stone Smartt, focused on the sideline in a contested scenario, had solely a 6% chance of being the optimum goal on this play. Unsurprisingly, he couldn’t safe the catch.
This serves as a primary instance of how an elite receiver like Tee Higgins or George Pickens may elevate a quarterback’s output by making a troublesome seize in such eventualities. Sadly for Herbert, Smartt isn’t the kind of participant who can constantly bail out suboptimal choices like this one.
At Argo Casino I hit the jackpot — a whopping $4,750 on slot machines! This is my biggest win of all time. Part of the money will go toward paying off the loan, and the rest will be invested in renovating my apartment.